In Part 1 of this series, we started with a basic Data-Reader / SQL Connection/Command pattern and illustrated how it is possible to abstract the parsing of the Data Reader into a standalone object that can be fully unit tested in isolation of the calling code. In Part 2 of the series we made a very simple optimisation to the “DataReader” convertor and updated the tests to capture/verify the changes.
In part 3 of the series, we put this all together into a repository pattern to create a reusable and testable data access layer. The first step is to create an interface for the repository.
namespace DataAccess.Example { using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Data.BoilerPlate; public interface IRespository { IEnumerable<TEntity> Get(IQuery query, IConvertDataReader<TEntity> dataReaderConvertor); } }
The intent implied by the interface is that “Get” will be responsible for returning an enumerable list of a generic. To do this we pass in an implementation of IQuery and an implementation of IConvertDataReader for the generic we are to return. We already have an implementation of IConvertDataReader that we can use from the previous post. In this example, the implementation of IQuery just returns SQL text that can be executed and is shown below.
namespace DataAccess.Example { public interface IQuery { string Text { get; } } } namespace DataAccess.Example { public class GetAllCustomersQuery : IQuery { public string Text { get { return "SELECT id, Firstname, Surname FROM Customer"; } } } }
The final piece of the jigsaw is the implementation of the repository interface, in this instance for SQL but it could be any data provider that returns an implementation of IDataReader. A basic implementation of the SQL repository is shown below:
namespace DataAccess.Example { using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Data.BoilerPlate; using System.Data.SqlClient; public class SqlRepository : IRespository { private readonly SqlConnectionStringBuilder config; public SqlRepository(SqlConnectionStringBuilder config) { this.config = config; } public IEnumerable<TEntity> Get<TEntity>(IQuery query, IConvertDataReader<TEntity> dataReaderConvertor) { using (var connection = new SqlConnection(this.config.ConnectionString)) { using (var command = connection.CreateCommand()) { command.CommandText = query.Text; connection.Open(); using (var dataReader = command.ExecuteReader()) { while (dataReader.Read()) { yield return dataReaderConvertor.Parse(dataReader); } } } } } } }
We now have a repository object that can be used against any SQL database to return a list of any type of object that can be populated using a standard SQL SELECT statement; the code below shows how to put this together.
var customers = new SqlRepository(connectionString).Get( new GetAllCustomersQuery(), new CustomerDRConvertorPart2()).ToList();
To understand the power of this pattern, consider the following code that is all that is needed to update the previous code to return a different list of customers; in this case all those with the first name of “Paul”.
namespace DataAccess.Example { public class GetAllCustomersCalledPaul : IQuery { public string Text { get { return "SELECT id, Firstname, Surname FROM Customer WHERE Firstname = 'Paul'"; } } } } var customers = new SqlRepository(connectionString).Get( new <b>GetAllCustomersCalledPaul</b>(), new CustomerDRConvertorPart2()).ToList();
Part 4 shows how the code can be modified so it can be extended to handle different “query types”.
As part of his fantastic ‘What is .NET standard‘ presentation at DDD12, Adam Ralph provided an amazing amount of detail in such a short amount of time. One of the most valuable points, which is completely obvious when you think about it, is how you should work with .NET standard when creating libraries. NET standard now comes in a multitude of flavours: currently 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6 and 2.0. When starting out . . .
If you’re trying to access a class library (.NET Standard) from a traditional console application (in VS2017 those can be found under ‘Windows Classic Desktop’) you will run into problems; which can feel a little strange for something that was pretty simple in VS2015 and earlier. You can add a reference to the class library project (Resharper will even volunteer to add the dependency / namespace reference if you don’t already have it). But the . . .